This paper assesses the merits of countercyclical loan loss provisioning in Uruguay. Using a stress test methodology, it quantifies the protection against macroeconomic shocks provided by the stock of dynamic provisions accumulated since 2001 and finds that medium-sized shocks would be fully absorbed, offsetting the additional costs caused by rising specific provisions. In addition, the paper simulates the path of dynamic provisions under the formulas used in Spain, Peru and Bolivia, showing that the alternative paths diverge significantly from the actual buildup and in part better conform to the Uruguayan credit cycle.
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
|
paperback
else
|
epub
else
|
mobi
else
|
English |
|
|
|
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.