Pandemics and Inequality: Perceptions and Preferences for Redistribution

Pandemics and Inequality: Perceptions and Preferences for Redistribution
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2021 Issue 053
Publication date: February 2021
ISBN: 9781513570723
$18.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
Paperback
English
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Labor , Economics- Macroeconomics , Demography , inequality , perceptions , government , political economy , WP , government response , government performance , government intervention , health crisis , containment measure

Summary

This paper uses an individual-level survey conducted by the Edelman Trust Barometer in mid-April for 11 advanced and emerging market economies to examine perceptions of government performance in managing the health and economic crisis, beliefs about the future, and attitudes about redistribution. We find that women, non-college educated, the unemployed, and those in non-teleworkable jobs systematically have less favorable perceptions of government responses. Personally experiencing illness or job loss caused by the pandemic can shape people’s beliefs about the future, heightening uncertainties about prolonged job losses, and the imminent threat from automation. Economic anxieties are amplified in countries that experienced an early surge in infections followed by successful containment, suggesting that negative beliefs can persist. Support for pro-equality redistributive policies varies, depending on personal experiences and views about the poor. However, we find strong willingness to provide social safety nets for vulnerable individuals and firms by those who have a more favorable perception of government responses, suggesting that effective government actions can promote support for redistributive policies.