United States:Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note-Financial Crisis Preparedness and Deposit Insurance

Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note-Financial Crisis Preparedness and Deposit Insurance
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2020 Issue 245
Publication date: August 2020
ISBN: 9781513552903
$18.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
paperback else
pdf else
epub else
English
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Banks and Banking , Finance , ISCR , CR , resolution regime , FDIC OIG , host resolution authority , FDIC crisis readiness planning , FDIC recordkeeping , FDIC resolution measure , FDIC-administered deposit insurance fund , financial crisis , DFA Title I , depositor preference regime , FDIC rule , Crisis prevention , Crisis management , Deposit insurance , Bank resolution framework , Global

Also of interest
Summary

The U.S. authorities should preserve the considerable progress in the resiliency, recoverability, and resolvability of financial companies and insured depository institutions (IDIs), and intensify financial crisis preparedness efforts. After a decade of resolution planning, the development of the U.S. resolution regime is more advanced than in other major economies. This regime, together with the strong track record of the deposit insurance system (DIS) for banks and the federal banking agencies’ (FBAs) preparation for resolution, provide a strong foundation for crisis preparedness. Bank holding companies (BHCs) have integrated recovery and resolution planning (RRP) into business-as-usual (BAU) activities, increasing their resiliency; this process has deepened the FBAs’ understanding of the BHCs’ business models and RRP capabilities. The FBAs should continue their own annual resolution planning and mitigate the recent changes that reduced the BHCs’ RRP. These efforts should be complemented by further interagency crisis preparedness, including particularly with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (UST), given its essential role in critical aspects of crisis responses. Finally, further refinements relating to cross-border resolution also deserve attention.